Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 25, 2019 at 20:34 comment added Clark Barwick Of course. Thanks!
Jul 25, 2019 at 18:12 comment added Simone Virili @ClarkBarwick, for such an example consider the dual situation: consider a Grothendieck category $A$ where products are not exact (this happens for several categories of q.coh. sheaves). Then $A$ is the heart of the canonical $t$-structure in its derived category $D(A)$, but it is not closed under products taken in $D(A)$. Now, for your example, pass to the opposite category.
Jul 25, 2019 at 16:39 comment added Clark Barwick Agreed. I was initially confused by the phrase 'closed under', so I wanted to underscore the distinction, in case that was contributing to your sense of surprise! (Incidentally, do you have an easy example of such a T for which the coproduct (in T) of objects in the heart do not remain in the heart?)
Jul 25, 2019 at 13:24 comment added Mikhail Bondarko Dear Clark, my problem was that I believed that this (obvious) statement is wrong.:) Besides, in my question I have described the relation between coproducts in the heart and in $T$ precisely; so I hope that this will not cause any confusion.
Jul 25, 2019 at 13:18 answer added Simone Virili timeline score: 2
Jul 25, 2019 at 9:04 comment added Clark Barwick I think one has to be careful about using the word 'closed with respect to coproducts' here. The heart obviously has coproducts, but in the generality you're working, I don't think they are preserved by the inclusion into your triangulated category T.
Jul 25, 2019 at 7:48 vote accept Mikhail Bondarko
Jul 24, 2019 at 22:05 answer added Jeremy Rickard timeline score: 5
Jul 24, 2019 at 20:05 history edited Mikhail Bondarko
edited tags
Jul 24, 2019 at 8:38 history asked Mikhail Bondarko CC BY-SA 4.0