Skip to main content

Almost all $n$ are insipid. In fact, the number of non-insipid numbers at most $n$ grows like $2n/\log n$. See the paper

See "CameronCameron, Peter J.; Neumann, Peter M.; Teague, David N. On the degrees of primitive permutation groups On the degrees of primitive permutation groups. Math Math. Z. 180 (1982), 141–149." doi.org/10.1007/BF01318900

Almost all $n$ are insipid. In fact, the number of non-insipid numbers at most $n$ grows like $2n/\log n$.

See "Cameron, Peter J.; Neumann, Peter M.; Teague, David N. On the degrees of primitive permutation groups. Math. Z. 180 (1982), 141–149."

Almost all $n$ are insipid. In fact, the number of non-insipid numbers at most $n$ grows like $2n/\log n$. See the paper

Cameron, Peter J.; Neumann, Peter M.; Teague, David N. On the degrees of primitive permutation groups. Math. Z. 180 (1982), 141–149. doi.org/10.1007/BF01318900

Source Link
verret
  • 3.3k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 30

Almost all $n$ are insipid. In fact, the number of non-insipid numbers at most $n$ grows like $2n/\log n$.

See "Cameron, Peter J.; Neumann, Peter M.; Teague, David N. On the degrees of primitive permutation groups. Math. Z. 180 (1982), 141–149."