Timeline for Simplicial set of permutations
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
23 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 14, 2019 at 9:26 | comment | added | Nikolai Mnev | @AndrejBauer Sure, mr. Zuckerberg manipulates. But we can manipulate back :) But for the big international network of friends it is still the only place. | |
Jul 14, 2019 at 9:19 | comment | added | Andrej Bauer | @NikolaiMnev: I could never manage that, Facebook actively tries to impose things that are not "good discussion". I stopped using it a year ago, never looked back. | |
Jul 14, 2019 at 9:18 | comment | added | Nikolai Mnev | @AndrejBauer If you maintain a good friend list than a good discussion can be even on Facebook | |
Jul 13, 2019 at 21:23 | comment | added | Andrej Bauer | Facebook discussion?! What's this world coming to? | |
Jul 13, 2019 at 15:22 | history | edited | Nikolai Mnev |
Added answer and accordingly edited flags
|
|
Jul 13, 2019 at 12:01 | comment | added | Nikolai Mnev | @TimothyChow Updated. | |
Jul 13, 2019 at 11:51 | history | edited | Nikolai Mnev | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 751 characters in body
|
Jul 12, 2019 at 16:06 | comment | added | Timothy Chow | @NikolaiMnev : Not everyone on MathOverflow is on Facebook. (I am not on Facebook.) I would recommend that you summarize the conclusions of the Facebook discussion here, either by editing your question or by posting an answer to your own question. | |
S Jul 12, 2019 at 0:10 | history | suggested | Christian Gaetz |
added combinatorics tag after answer pointed out connection to permutation patterns
|
|
Jul 12, 2019 at 0:08 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jul 12, 2019 at 0:10 | |||||
Jul 11, 2019 at 23:14 | history | edited | Nikolai Mnev | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 167 characters in body
|
Jul 11, 2019 at 14:41 | comment | added | Nikolai Mnev | @darijgrinberg Edited. There goes fruitful discussion on Facebook, but i have no idea how to make a reference here. | |
Jul 11, 2019 at 13:52 | history | edited | Nikolai Mnev | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 36 characters in body
|
Jul 11, 2019 at 13:44 | comment | added | darij grinberg | Well, you omitted the "add 1" part in the OP. | |
Jul 11, 2019 at 13:35 | comment | added | Nikolai Mnev | @darijgrinberg I am using usual simplicial topology conventions, attributing to simplicial degeneracy operation but permuted. Meaning add one to all elements on j places with $\eta(j) > \eta(i)$ and put as $i+1$-th element $\eta(i)+1$. it is right the same what Fedor says , but in simplicial algebra $\frac{1}{2}$ looks very foreign :) | |
Jul 11, 2019 at 12:46 | comment | added | darij grinberg | @NikolaiMnev: If it's $\eta(i)+1$, then what about Fedor's comment? There is no canonical monotone reordering when two entries are equal. | |
Jul 11, 2019 at 11:14 | history | edited | Nikolai Mnev | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
Jul 11, 2019 at 11:11 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Jul 11, 2019 at 8:41 | answer | added | Russ Woodroofe | timeline score: 3 | |
Jul 10, 2019 at 17:01 | comment | added | Nikolai Mnev | @FedorPetrov right. Sorry was fighting with phone replying. Snd finnsly killed the comment. | |
Jul 10, 2019 at 16:55 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | $s_3(51243)=612354$, right? | |
Jul 10, 2019 at 16:33 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | In $s_i$ you mean that we insert something like $\eta(i)+1/2$? $\eta(i)+1$ may be already in the permutation. | |
Jul 10, 2019 at 16:28 | history | asked | Nikolai Mnev | CC BY-SA 4.0 |