Timeline for How to prove that Chevalley groups over $\mathbb R$ have no compact factors
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2019 at 13:32 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | @YCor: Thanks for the help with proofreading! I don't always put enough effort into this (for example, my "expicit" near the end of the first paragraph). Macular degeneration in my eyes has been kept under control for years by regular Avastin injections, but in the past year I've had to start on Eliquis (a new blood thinner) due to afib, which counteracts that improvement in vision. | |
| Jul 8, 2019 at 13:28 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | @Ami: Correct, but it does depend on what tools you already have. | |
| Jul 7, 2019 at 20:02 | comment | added | Ami | Maybe it'll be simpler to prove that the sublattices of $G(\mathbb Z)$ are Zariski dense in $G(\mathbb R)$ without using the Borel density theorem? | |
| Jul 6, 2019 at 19:47 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
typo
|
| Jul 6, 2019 at 19:43 | history | edited | Jim Humphreys | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 82 characters in body
|
| Jul 6, 2019 at 19:19 | history | answered | Jim Humphreys | CC BY-SA 4.0 |