Timeline for The Koch snow flake, Holder exponents of conformal mappings
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2019 at 12:09 | comment | added | sharpe | Why can you deduce $\beta \ge \log2/ \log3$? | |
| Dec 24, 2019 at 4:17 | comment | added | sharpe | @DanieleTampieri Thank you for showing me the paper by Vivaldi and Lancia. But, I do not know how to use it. By using their results, we can just see $\beta \le \log2/\log3$. | |
| Dec 20, 2019 at 9:48 | comment | added | Daniele Tampieri | @sharpe, Carlo, a copy of the paper of Vivaldi and Lancia, though of not so high graphical quality, can be found here. | |
| Jul 14, 2019 at 11:02 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| Jul 6, 2019 at 12:16 | comment | added | sharpe | Thank you for your comment. U.R Freiberg and M.R. Lancia show in Prop 2.2 that the domain of the energy from on Koch curve (not on Koch snow flake) is continuously embedded into the space of Holder continuous functions with exponent $\log2/\log3$. However, does this result lead us to an estimate of the Holder exponents of conformal mappings $\phi$ and $\phi^{-1}$? | |
| Jul 6, 2019 at 10:24 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 56 characters in body
|
| Jul 6, 2019 at 10:18 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 164 characters in body
|
| Jul 6, 2019 at 10:11 | history | answered | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |