Timeline for Variations on Kaplansky Density
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2019 at 14:49 | comment | added | Narutaka OZAWA | I feel the answer to the second question is NO; probably the solution $x$ to the norm inequality may not extend from $\pi(A)''$ to $A^{**}$ (which is necessarily if there is a solution in $A$). | |
| Jun 25, 2019 at 14:44 | history | edited | Narutaka OZAWA | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 48 characters in body
|
| Jun 25, 2019 at 13:44 | history | edited | Narutaka OZAWA | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 126 characters in body
|
| Jun 25, 2019 at 11:51 | vote | accept | Matthew Daws | ||
| Jun 25, 2019 at 11:51 | history | edited | Matthew Daws | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Correct inequality in statements of Lemmas 3 and 4.
|
| Jun 25, 2019 at 11:50 | comment | added | Matthew Daws | Great! So the strategy is to use the trick to move to the bidual $A^{**}$, apply Hahn-Banach to get within $\epsilon>0$, and then some functional calculus arguments. BTW I edited to make it $\|a\| \leq 1+k$ in Lemmas 3 and 4. | |
| Jun 25, 2019 at 9:12 | history | answered | Narutaka OZAWA | CC BY-SA 4.0 |