Skip to main content
added 5 characters in body
Source Link
Josiah Park
  • 3.2k
  • 13
  • 28

Yes, this is true. Since there exists a 'decoder' $Q$ which gives a value on the right hand side (close to or equal to) $\frac{1}{2}$, the pair $(A,Q)$ are $(\ell_2, \ell_1)$$(\ell_\infty, \ell_1)$-instance optimal (see this talk of Foucart, pg 75, for details). From this it follows that no non-trivial $2$-sparse vectors lie in the kernel of $A$ and that $A$ satisfies the null space property of order $2$ for recovery via $\ell_1$-minimization.

Chapter 11 of Foucart's book is another reference for this topic.

Yes, this is true. Since there exists a 'decoder' $Q$ which gives a value on the right hand side (close to or equal to) $\frac{1}{2}$, the pair $(A,Q)$ are $(\ell_2, \ell_1)$-instance optimal (see this talk of Foucart, pg 75, for details). From this it follows that no non-trivial $2$-sparse vectors lie in the kernel of $A$ and that $A$ satisfies the null space property of order $2$ for recovery via $\ell_1$-minimization.

Chapter 11 of Foucart's book is another reference for this topic.

Yes, this is true. Since there exists a 'decoder' $Q$ which gives a value on the right hand side (close to or equal to) $\frac{1}{2}$, the pair $(A,Q)$ are $(\ell_\infty, \ell_1)$-instance optimal (see this talk of Foucart, pg 75, for details). From this it follows that no non-trivial $2$-sparse vectors lie in the kernel of $A$ and that $A$ satisfies the null space property of order $2$ for recovery via $\ell_1$-minimization.

Chapter 11 of Foucart's book is another reference for this topic.

added 99 characters in body
Source Link
Josiah Park
  • 3.2k
  • 13
  • 28

Yes, this is true. Since there exists a 'decoder' $Q$ which gives a value on the right hand side (close to or equal to) $\frac{1}{2}$, the pair $(A,Q)$ are $(\ell_2, \ell_1)$-instance optimal (see this talkthis talk of Foucart, pg 75, for details). From this it follows that no non-trivial $2$-sparse vectors lie in the kernel of $A$ and that $A$ satisfies the null space property of order $2$ for recovery via $\ell_1$-minimization.

Chapter 11 of Foucart's book is another reference for this topic.

Yes, this is true. Since there exists a 'decoder' $Q$ which gives a value on the right hand side (close to or equal to) $\frac{1}{2}$, the pair $(A,Q)$ are $(\ell_2, \ell_1)$-instance optimal (see this talk of Foucart, pg 75, for details). From this it follows that no non-trivial $2$-sparse vectors lie in the kernel of $A$.

Chapter 11 of Foucart's book is another reference for this topic.

Yes, this is true. Since there exists a 'decoder' $Q$ which gives a value on the right hand side (close to or equal to) $\frac{1}{2}$, the pair $(A,Q)$ are $(\ell_2, \ell_1)$-instance optimal (see this talk of Foucart, pg 75, for details). From this it follows that no non-trivial $2$-sparse vectors lie in the kernel of $A$ and that $A$ satisfies the null space property of order $2$ for recovery via $\ell_1$-minimization.

Chapter 11 of Foucart's book is another reference for this topic.

added 43 characters in body
Source Link
Josiah Park
  • 3.2k
  • 13
  • 28

Yes, this is true. Since there exists a 'decoder' $Q$ which gives a value on the right hand side (close to or equal to) $\frac{1}{2}$, the pair $(A,Q)$ are $(\ell_2, \ell_1)$-instance optimal (see this talk of Foucart, pg 75, for details). From this it follows that no non-trivial $2$-sparse vectors lie in the kernel of $A$.

Chapter 11 of Foucart's book is another reference for this topic.

Yes, this is true. Since there exists a 'decoder' $Q$ which gives a value (close to) $\frac{1}{2}$, the pair $(A,Q)$ are $(\ell_2, \ell_1)$-instance optimal (see this talk of Foucart for details).

Yes, this is true. Since there exists a 'decoder' $Q$ which gives a value on the right hand side (close to or equal to) $\frac{1}{2}$, the pair $(A,Q)$ are $(\ell_2, \ell_1)$-instance optimal (see this talk of Foucart, pg 75, for details). From this it follows that no non-trivial $2$-sparse vectors lie in the kernel of $A$.

Chapter 11 of Foucart's book is another reference for this topic.

added 168 characters in body
Source Link
Josiah Park
  • 3.2k
  • 13
  • 28
Loading
Post Undeleted by Josiah Park
deleted 236 characters in body
Source Link
Josiah Park
  • 3.2k
  • 13
  • 28
Loading
Post Deleted by Josiah Park
Source Link
Josiah Park
  • 3.2k
  • 13
  • 28
Loading