Skip to main content
Post Closed as "Not suitable for this site" by YCor, Sean Lawton, LSpice, Pace Nielsen, András Bátkai
fixed link
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286

This question is a follow-up to this post,this post, from which I quote:

Let $\mathfrak{e}$ be the 3-dimensional Lie algebra with basis $(H,X,Y)$ and bracket $[H,X]=Y$, $[H,Y]=-X$, $[X,Y]=0$. It is isomorphic to the Lie algebra of the group of isometries of the plane. Its central extension $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$ is defined as the 4-dimensional Lie algebra defined by adding a central generator $Z$ and the additional nonzero bracket $[X,Y]=Z$.

It seems to me that since $\mathrm{exp}$ is a diffeomorphism on a Carnot group then the latter's Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$, should not contain either $\mathfrak{e}$ or $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$. However, where can I find a proof of the fact that no Carnot group contains either $\mathfrak{e}$ or $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$ (without going through the Sato-Dixmier result of the quoted post).

This question is a follow-up to this post, from which I quote:

Let $\mathfrak{e}$ be the 3-dimensional Lie algebra with basis $(H,X,Y)$ and bracket $[H,X]=Y$, $[H,Y]=-X$, $[X,Y]=0$. It is isomorphic to the Lie algebra of the group of isometries of the plane. Its central extension $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$ is defined as the 4-dimensional Lie algebra defined by adding a central generator $Z$ and the additional nonzero bracket $[X,Y]=Z$.

It seems to me that since $\mathrm{exp}$ is a diffeomorphism on a Carnot group then the latter's Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$, should not contain either $\mathfrak{e}$ or $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$. However, where can I find a proof of the fact that no Carnot group contains either $\mathfrak{e}$ or $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$ (without going through the Sato-Dixmier result of the quoted post).

This question is a follow-up to this post, from which I quote:

Let $\mathfrak{e}$ be the 3-dimensional Lie algebra with basis $(H,X,Y)$ and bracket $[H,X]=Y$, $[H,Y]=-X$, $[X,Y]=0$. It is isomorphic to the Lie algebra of the group of isometries of the plane. Its central extension $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$ is defined as the 4-dimensional Lie algebra defined by adding a central generator $Z$ and the additional nonzero bracket $[X,Y]=Z$.

It seems to me that since $\mathrm{exp}$ is a diffeomorphism on a Carnot group then the latter's Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$, should not contain either $\mathfrak{e}$ or $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$. However, where can I find a proof of the fact that no Carnot group contains either $\mathfrak{e}$ or $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$ (without going through the Sato-Dixmier result of the quoted post).

Reference Request: Carnot Group Not ConatiningContaining Group of Isometries

This question is a follow-up to this post, from which I quote:

Let $\mathfrak{e}$ be the 3-dimensional Lie algebra with basis $(H,X,Y)$ and bracket $[H,X]=Y$, $[H,Y]=-X$, $[X,Y]=0$. It is isomorphic to the Lie algebra of the group of isometries of the plane. Its central extension $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$ is defined as the 4-dimensional Lie algebra defined by adding a central generator $Z$ and the additional nonzero bracket $[X,Y]=Z$.

It seems to me that since $exp$$\mathrm{exp}$ is a diffeomorphism on a Carnot group then the latter's Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$, should not contain either $\mathfrak{e}$ or $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$. However, where can I find a proof of the fact that no Carnot group contains either $\mathfrak{e}$ or $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$ (without going through the Sato-Dixmier result of the quoted post).

Reference Request: Carnot Group Not Conatining Group of Isometries

This question is a follow-up to this post, from which I quote:

Let $\mathfrak{e}$ be the 3-dimensional Lie algebra with basis $(H,X,Y)$ and bracket $[H,X]=Y$, $[H,Y]=-X$, $[X,Y]=0$. It is isomorphic to the Lie algebra of the group of isometries of the plane. Its central extension $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$ is defined as the 4-dimensional Lie algebra defined by adding a central generator $Z$ and the additional nonzero bracket $[X,Y]=Z$.

It seems to me that since $exp$ is a diffeomorphism on a Carnot group then the latter's Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$, should not contain either $\mathfrak{e}$ or $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$. However, where can I find a proof of the fact that no Carnot group contains either $\mathfrak{e}$ or $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$ (without going through the Sato-Dixmier result of the quoted post).

Reference Request: Carnot Group Not Containing Group of Isometries

This question is a follow-up to this post, from which I quote:

Let $\mathfrak{e}$ be the 3-dimensional Lie algebra with basis $(H,X,Y)$ and bracket $[H,X]=Y$, $[H,Y]=-X$, $[X,Y]=0$. It is isomorphic to the Lie algebra of the group of isometries of the plane. Its central extension $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$ is defined as the 4-dimensional Lie algebra defined by adding a central generator $Z$ and the additional nonzero bracket $[X,Y]=Z$.

It seems to me that since $\mathrm{exp}$ is a diffeomorphism on a Carnot group then the latter's Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$, should not contain either $\mathfrak{e}$ or $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$. However, where can I find a proof of the fact that no Carnot group contains either $\mathfrak{e}$ or $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$ (without going through the Sato-Dixmier result of the quoted post).

Source Link
ABIM
  • 5.4k
  • 3
  • 19
  • 41

Reference Request: Carnot Group Not Conatining Group of Isometries

This question is a follow-up to this post, from which I quote:

Let $\mathfrak{e}$ be the 3-dimensional Lie algebra with basis $(H,X,Y)$ and bracket $[H,X]=Y$, $[H,Y]=-X$, $[X,Y]=0$. It is isomorphic to the Lie algebra of the group of isometries of the plane. Its central extension $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$ is defined as the 4-dimensional Lie algebra defined by adding a central generator $Z$ and the additional nonzero bracket $[X,Y]=Z$.

It seems to me that since $exp$ is a diffeomorphism on a Carnot group then the latter's Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$, should not contain either $\mathfrak{e}$ or $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$. However, where can I find a proof of the fact that no Carnot group contains either $\mathfrak{e}$ or $\tilde{\mathfrak{e}}$ (without going through the Sato-Dixmier result of the quoted post).