Timeline for Matrices whose exponential is stochastic
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2010 at 16:01 | vote | accept | Mike Stay | ||
| Jul 25, 2010 at 13:17 | comment | added | Steve Huntsman | The grumpy old man in me can't resist: an order of magnitude more people surely learn about Markov processes than coherent sheaves or motivic homotopy theory or whatever "most" mathematicians supposedly study at any level. | |
| Jul 25, 2010 at 6:14 | comment | added | Victor Protsak | I join David Speyer in voting against closing. Note that Pietro's answer addresses a stronger condition, namely, that the matrix exponent of any positive multiple of $A$ is stochastic. | |
| Jul 25, 2010 at 6:10 | comment | added | Victor Protsak | I've changed the title (Pietro, you can do it, too!). | |
| Jul 25, 2010 at 6:09 | history | edited | Victor Protsak | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
tags, title, wording of the question
|
| Jul 25, 2010 at 4:36 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | More generic than "Analogy question" is "Question". Or also "This question" if one wants to be somehow more precise. | |
| Jul 25, 2010 at 3:50 | answer | added | Pietro Majer | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jul 25, 2010 at 2:13 | comment | added | David E Speyer | I disagree with the suggestion that this question be closed. It's a basic question, with a simple answer, but if you don't know the field it's not obvious where to look this up and the subject is hardly one which most mathematicians cover in grad school. As per this discussion, tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/506/… , consider me a vote against closing. | |
| Jul 24, 2010 at 22:42 | answer | added | Steve Huntsman | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 24, 2010 at 22:31 | comment | added | Steve Huntsman | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… | |
| Jul 24, 2010 at 21:21 | history | asked | Mike Stay | CC BY-SA 2.5 |