Skip to main content
20 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 22, 2019 at 19:56 comment added Mark Grant @LuisA.Florit: I guess I was thinking more about the h-principle as it manifests itself in the Smale-Hirsch theory of immersions, which says roughly that there exist an immersion of M into N iff there exists a vector bundle monomorphism from TM into TN. There are some conditions, such as dim(M)<dim(N). See Hirsch's "Immersions of manifolds".
May 22, 2019 at 18:04 comment added Luis A. Florit @MarkGrant: How would you use the h-principle for this? Are you suggesting we could try to prove that any vector bundle over, say, a compact Lie Group, which itself admits an immersion as a Euclidean hypersurface, also admits an immersion as a Euclidean hypersurface? BTW, I am interested in rank 8 vector bundles, although I don't think this helps.
May 22, 2019 at 18:02 comment added Luis A. Florit @MikeMiller: yes, I understood this, and it is the answer I was looking for (you may write it as an answer if you wish). What I didn't understand was Mark's comment about the h-principle (that I thought it was yours, sorry).
May 21, 2019 at 20:44 comment added mme @LuisA.Florit I think one of us misunderstands the other: I am claiming that any vector bundle $E \to B$, where $B$ is a closed manifold, is a smooth submanifold of the closed manifold $S(E \oplus \Bbb R)$. Therefore, the existence of a smooth immersion $S(E \oplus \Bbb R) \to \Bbb R^{2\dim E - a(\dim E)}$ implies the existence of an immersion $E \hookrightarrow \Bbb R^{2\dim E - a(\dim E)}$, by restriction. (Here $\dim E$ means dimension of the total space --- not rank). As far as I can tell, this is what you are asking for: the answers below are about improving this bound.
May 21, 2019 at 20:20 comment added Luis A. Florit @MarkGrant: I didn't know that Cohen worked for manifolds with boundary. But, as Mike said, the double immerses, so we are fine.
May 21, 2019 at 20:18 comment added Luis A. Florit @MikeMiller (2) Yes, the normal bundle immerses in the same Euclidean space, but why any vector bundle would?
May 21, 2019 at 20:16 comment added Luis A. Florit @MikeMiller (1): Aha! That's the trick I was expecting: fibrewise compactification. I did not know that thing was a smooth manifold.
May 21, 2019 at 16:47 comment added mme @MarkGrant of course, that also works --- it was only obvious to me in retrospect that Cohen's theorem was also true for compact manifolds with boundary; but after all, I was just taking the double of what you said to get rid of the boundary, and whence a proof for the boundary case follows from the proof in the closed case.
May 21, 2019 at 13:33 answer added Qfwfq timeline score: 1
May 21, 2019 at 11:41 answer added Ryan Budney timeline score: 4
May 21, 2019 at 8:59 comment added Mark Grant I suspect that you can do better using the h-principle. As vague evidence for this, if you have an immersion of the base $M$ in some Euclidean space, then its normal bundle $E$ immerses in the same Euclidean space (as an immersed tubular neighbourhood).
May 21, 2019 at 8:57 comment added Mark Grant @MikeMiller: Why not just immerse the unit disk bundle for some Riemannian metric?
May 21, 2019 at 6:11 history edited ThiKu CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
May 21, 2019 at 1:00 comment added mme The total space of a vector bundle is a smooth submanifold of the corresponding fiberwise one-point compactification, aka $S(E \oplus \Bbb R)$, which is a closed manifold of the same dimension $n$ as $E$ so long as the base is closed. Since the larger space immerses in $\Bbb R^{2n-a(n)}$, so does the smaller space.
May 20, 2019 at 21:49 history edited Luis A. Florit CC BY-SA 4.0
added 21 characters in body
May 20, 2019 at 21:08 comment added Luis A. Florit @Misha: yes, sorry.
May 20, 2019 at 20:51 comment added Misha What do you mean by immersion of a vector bundle? Do you mean an immersion of the total space?
May 20, 2019 at 20:12 history edited András Bátkai CC BY-SA 4.0
formatted citation
May 20, 2019 at 20:05 review First posts
May 20, 2019 at 20:12
May 20, 2019 at 20:04 history asked Luis A. Florit CC BY-SA 4.0