Timeline for Does the space of $n \times n$, positive-definite, self-adjoint, real matrices have a better name?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Jul 7, 2013 at 10:04 | history | suggested | Davide Giraudo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved formatting.
|
Jul 7, 2013 at 8:42 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jul 7, 2013 at 10:04 | |||||
Jul 7, 2013 at 0:23 | history | edited | user9072 |
edited tags
|
|
May 25, 2012 at 19:23 | comment | added | Felix Goldberg | Better in what sense? | |
May 25, 2012 at 19:05 | answer | added | kjetil b halvorsen | timeline score: 1 | |
Nov 5, 2009 at 9:10 | answer | added | Jonas Meyer | timeline score: 5 | |
Oct 23, 2009 at 19:15 | answer | added | Mark Meckes | timeline score: 7 | |
Oct 18, 2009 at 22:46 | vote | accept | Tom LaGatta | ||
Oct 14, 2009 at 18:38 | answer | added | Lior Silberman | timeline score: 6 | |
Oct 14, 2009 at 9:09 | answer | added | Darsh Ranjan | timeline score: 8 | |
Oct 12, 2009 at 3:41 | history | edited | Anton Geraschenko |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 12, 2009 at 2:54 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | The bilinear form should still be positive definite. | |
Oct 12, 2009 at 1:45 | answer | added | Kim Morrison | timeline score: 2 | |
Oct 12, 2009 at 1:13 | history | asked | Tom LaGatta | CC BY-SA 2.5 |