Timeline for Special submodules over almost Dedekind domains
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 17, 2019 at 9:41 | history | edited | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Rewording of the paragraph about condition (IIPM)
|
May 16, 2019 at 10:15 | history | edited | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixes statement referring to Heinzer and Olberding result
|
May 16, 2019 at 9:07 | history | edited | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Puts a reference to Heinzer and Olberding right after the definition of (IIPM)
|
May 16, 2019 at 6:53 | history | edited | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Mentions that the decomposition is actually unique
|
May 16, 2019 at 6:52 | comment | added | Luc Guyot | @user140640 I do not address the case of an arbitrary almost Dedekind ring $R$. I consider only those $R$ such that $R/I$ has at least one finitely generated maximal ideal for every non-zero proper ideal of $R$. I added a line to make this restriction clear. | |
May 16, 2019 at 6:47 | history | edited | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Makes the restriction (extra assumptions) explicit
|
May 16, 2019 at 5:35 | comment | added | user140640 | Dear Luc Guyot, thank you for your answer. Probably, you use statment 2 or 3 of [1, Corollary 3.9] to represented $I$ as an irredundant intersection of positive powers of maximal ideals of $R$. But I cannot undrestant how other condition of statment 2 or 3 of [1, Corollary 3.9] are satisfied? Please, if it is possible, explain it more. | |
May 15, 2019 at 22:32 | history | answered | Luc Guyot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |