Timeline for Anabelian geometry ~ higher category theory
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2019 at 11:18 | comment | added | user138661 | thanks for the advice, I guess... | |
| May 12, 2019 at 21:24 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | @schematic_boi just open one of the IUT papers and scroll to a random page and you'll see... | |
| May 12, 2019 at 17:32 | comment | added | user138661 | ah OK. No, I never did, too weak for that (and also his popularity after Scholze--Stix is not exactly on the rise). Does Mochizuki also like to give emphasis of different nature? | |
| May 12, 2019 at 17:29 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | They are both emphasis, of a different nature. Also, have you ever tried to read Mochizuki? | |
| May 12, 2019 at 16:55 | comment | added | user138661 | is the usage of italic following bold text intentional? Maybe I am missing some nuance of typography, but it looks weird to me. | |
| May 12, 2019 at 16:02 | vote | accept | prdnr | ||
| May 12, 2019 at 12:06 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | And, because I'm sure people may wonder about the simplistic nature of some of the more mathematical explanations, I was aiming for as broad an audience as possible, as opposed to Ivan Fesenko's article on IUT in the same venue, which I suspect would lose even mathematicians too unfamiliar with certain parts of arithmetic geometry. | |
| May 12, 2019 at 12:03 | history | answered | David Roberts♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |