Timeline for Hopf algebra in derived category vector spaces
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2019 at 11:26 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | (I've edited the previous comment in response to a flag.) Which part needs explaining? Do you know what a symmetric monoidal ($k$-linear) functor is? Do you understand that if a concept (such as the notion of Hopf algebra object) is definable in the language of symmetric monoidal $k$-linear categories, then a symmetric monoidal $k$-linear functor will map models of that concept in the domain category to ones in the codomain? | |
| Jun 8, 2019 at 1:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| May 8, 2019 at 23:35 | answer | added | Marco Farinati | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 6, 2019 at 16:28 | comment | added | hopfology | Could you actually explain your answer? | |
| May 6, 2019 at 11:30 | comment | added | Denis Nardin | When restricted to these subcategories, the functor $H^0(-)$ is symmetric monoidal and so preserves the Hopf algebra structures. I'm really not sure that this is a research-level question though. | |
| May 6, 2019 at 7:00 | review | First posts | |||
| May 6, 2019 at 10:51 | |||||
| May 6, 2019 at 6:55 | history | asked | hopfology | CC BY-SA 4.0 |