Skip to main content

Timeline for Solution of ODE with discontinuity

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 27, 2019 at 16:47 answer added Bazin timeline score: 1
Apr 26, 2019 at 15:10 review Close votes
May 2, 2019 at 3:05
Apr 25, 2019 at 12:24 answer added Carlo Beenakker timeline score: 1
Apr 25, 2019 at 12:12 comment added Riku @CarloBeenakker Yes. And the real problem is computing $\Phi_2$.
Apr 25, 2019 at 12:11 comment added Carlo Beenakker your notation is very confusing, but let me make an effort to parse it: if I only look at the first component of each of your equations, then I see that $G_1=0$, so $\partial_t\Phi_1=0$, and since $\Phi_1=x_1$ at $t=0$, I conclude that $\Phi_1=x_1$ at all $t$. Is that what you want?
Apr 25, 2019 at 11:55 history edited Riku CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 2 characters in body
Apr 25, 2019 at 11:55 comment added Riku @CarloBeenakker That is a typo. Thank you. I'll edit it.
Apr 25, 2019 at 11:54 comment added Carlo Beenakker this still makes no sense; if $\Phi=(\Phi_1,\Phi_2)\in\mathbb{R}^2$, then $\Phi_2\in\mathbb{R}$; but in the definition of $G(x,y)$ you use $F(y)$ and if as you say $y$ should be replaced by $\Phi_2$, then you wish to evaluate the function $F$ at a point in $\mathbb{R}$, however, you have defined $F:\mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$.
Apr 25, 2019 at 11:48 history edited Riku CC BY-SA 4.0
edited tags
Apr 25, 2019 at 11:48 comment added Riku @user64494 $\Phi:\mathbb R^2 \to \mathbb R^2$. We use $\Phi_1$ as $x$ and $\Phi_2$ as $y$.
Apr 25, 2019 at 8:05 review Close votes
Apr 25, 2019 at 18:51
Apr 25, 2019 at 4:20 comment added user64494 Also $G$ has two arguments, but you wrote $G(\Phi)$.
Apr 25, 2019 at 4:06 comment added user64494 BTW, this is a PDE, not an ODE. Please fix it in the question..
Apr 25, 2019 at 0:59 history asked Riku CC BY-SA 4.0