Timeline for Representation of the group of automorphisms on the holomorphic forms
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Sep 26, 2013 at 7:44 | history | suggested | Sergiy Kozerenko | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor TeX improvements
|
| Sep 26, 2013 at 6:26 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 26, 2013 at 7:44 | |||||
| Jul 22, 2010 at 19:30 | comment | added | expmat | 1. I don't know but I saw this claim in Streit's paper "Homology, Belyĭ functions and canonical curves" 2. I really just have the matrices. I don't have a basis for any of the spaces. 3. Thanks for the reference. I will take a look at it. | |
| Jul 22, 2010 at 19:18 | comment | added | JSE | 1. Is it obvious that the isomorphism class of Omega(X) as a C[G]-module is determined by the isomorphism class of Harm(X)? 2. On the other hand: when you say you have "matrices associated to each element of the group," it sounds like you have more than a description of the isomorphism class of Harm(X) as C[G]-module, but rather have the action of G on an explicit basis of harmonic forms. Or is what you have the action of G on an explicit basis for the first homology? 3. In any event, I believe this issue was discussed in De Jong & Noot's paper "Jacobians with complex multiplications." | |
| Jul 22, 2010 at 18:46 | history | edited | expmat | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 274 characters in body; deleted 93 characters in body
|
| Jul 22, 2010 at 16:49 | history | asked | expmat | CC BY-SA 2.5 |