Timeline for Inversion inequalities
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2019 at 21:21 | answer | added | Max Alekseyev | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 23, 2019 at 23:51 | history | edited | Max Alekseyev |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 23, 2019 at 23:34 | comment | added | KDD | Right, I mean for adjacent transposition. | |
| Apr 23, 2019 at 23:34 | history | edited | KDD | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Apr 23, 2019 at 23:31 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | The notion of inversion I am familiar with is different. Inv(1,2) is different from inv(1,3) for two transpositions, and the +-1 property you cite does not hold. How are you computing Inv? Gerhard "Maybe I Got It Backwards?" Paseman, 2019.04.23. | |
| Apr 23, 2019 at 23:21 | history | edited | KDD | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 13 characters in body
|
| Apr 23, 2019 at 22:07 | comment | added | KDD | Right. I want to know if one can construct $\pi_i$ for which such $\pi$ exists. | |
| Apr 23, 2019 at 22:06 | history | edited | KDD | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Apr 23, 2019 at 21:02 | history | asked | KDD | CC BY-SA 4.0 |