Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 25, 2019 at 15:11 vote accept CommunityBot
Apr 22, 2019 at 6:40 comment added Laurent Moret-Bailly @schematic_boi Your question would be more appropriate for math.stackexchange so this is a welcoming present: you easily reduce to observing that if a space is noetherian, irreducible, and a finite union of finitely many irreducible locally closed subspaces, then one of them must be dense, hence open.
Apr 21, 2019 at 20:26 comment added user138661 @LaurentMoret-Bailly but is a non-locally closed constructible subset of a Noetherian sober space necessarily sober? Do you have some reference for that?
Apr 21, 2019 at 20:02 comment added Laurent Moret-Bailly @schematic_boi In the case of $\mathbb{C}$-schemes of finite type, assuming that $f$ is a $\mathbb{C}$-morphism, I suggest you use Chevalley's theorem that the image of $f$ is constructible.
Apr 21, 2019 at 19:51 comment added Laurent Moret-Bailly @Wojowu You can describe it as the open subscheme of $\mathrm{Spec}(\prod_p\mathbb{F}_p)$ whose complement is defined by the ideal $\bigoplus_p\mathbb{F}_p$. I do think your definition is better!
Apr 21, 2019 at 19:25 comment added Wojowu This scheme is not a spectrum of any ring (since it's not quasicompact), if that's what you are talking about. I honestly don't know how to describe this scheme any better than just as a disjoint union of ringed topological spaces.
Apr 21, 2019 at 19:19 comment added მამუკა ჯიბლაძე Which scheme do you mean? As a space, the disjoint union of the $\operatorname{Spec}{\mathbb F}_p$ is discrete. It is the underlying space of which scheme? But it is not e. g. $\operatorname{Spec}$ of the product of all ${\mathbb F}_p$, is it? Because not seeing what is $X$ I do not see why $(0)$ is not in the image.
Apr 21, 2019 at 18:02 comment added user138661 can this happen if both source and target are integral schemes of finite type over $\mathbb{C}$?
Apr 21, 2019 at 18:00 history answered Wojowu CC BY-SA 4.0