Timeline for Semisimplicity of the category of coherent sheaves?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2019 at 15:40 | history | edited | user25309 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
Apr 13, 2019 at 15:40 | comment | added | Leonid Positselski | Oh, yes. Then you are right. | |
Apr 13, 2019 at 15:40 | history | edited | user25309 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 174 characters in body
|
Apr 13, 2019 at 15:38 | comment | added | user25309 | The issue is maybe the correct definition of "semisimple". If I look at ncatlab.org/nlab/show/semisimple+category or en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-simplicity , the definition is that every object is a direct sum of finitely many simple objects. If we remove the condition "finitely many", I agree with your comments. | |
Apr 13, 2019 at 15:24 | comment | added | Leonid Positselski | ... So, in particular, the structure sheaf over such a scheme $X$ is the infinite direct sum, and at the same time the infinite product, of the one-dimensional (skyscraper) sheaves $k_x$ sitting at the points $x\in X$. These skyscraper sheaves are simple objects. | |
Apr 13, 2019 at 15:19 | comment | added | Leonid Positselski | No, the category of coherent sheaves over an infinite disjoint union of reduced points is semisimple abelian, in fact. It is equivalent to the infinite Cartesian product of the categories of finite-dimensional vector spaces over the related fields. Every object in it is naturally the direct sum of its components sitting at the points, and at the same time it is the infinite product of the same components. | |
Apr 13, 2019 at 15:10 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
Apr 13, 2019 at 15:05 | history | answered | user25309 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |