Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 15, 2019 at 8:06 comment added JP McCarthy @LSpice I appreciate your comment but perhaps it is better to have too much and have my question understood right away, than to have too little and have to have clarifications and potential misinterpretations.
Apr 14, 2019 at 0:38 history edited Konstantinos Kanakoglou
edited tags
Apr 13, 2019 at 13:11 review Suggested edits
Apr 13, 2019 at 13:30
Apr 13, 2019 at 6:20 history edited JP McCarthy CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Apr 13, 2019 at 2:10 answer added Konstantinos Kanakoglou timeline score: 5
Apr 12, 2019 at 19:27 comment added Geoff Robinson @LSpice : There is some discussion of this in arxiv.org/abs/math/0308281 , for example.
Apr 12, 2019 at 19:11 comment added Francois Ziegler Canonical bases? (e.g. Chari-Pressley 1994, Chap. 14.)
Apr 12, 2019 at 18:49 comment added Sam Hopkins There is e.g. the famous example of Lusztig's conjecture about representations of quantum groups at root of unity and representation of Lie algebras in positive characteristic (see the lots of discussion at mathoverflow.net/questions/138310/…). But I think one problem with the question as phrased is that Lie theorists might not consider themselves group theorists anyways.
Apr 12, 2019 at 18:43 history edited JP McCarthy CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Apr 12, 2019 at 18:36 comment added LSpice @GeoffRobinson, do you happen to have any specific references? That sounds interesting.
Apr 12, 2019 at 18:28 comment added Geoff Robinson In representation theory, there are examples where specilializing the parameter $q$ to a suitable root of unity turns difficult characterisiic $p$ problems into characteristic zero problems.
Apr 12, 2019 at 18:13 comment added LSpice It seems to me that the many, many paragraphs of motivation add only empty generalisations, not examples; I think just the paragraph on Peter–Weyl and the question itself would make a good post.
Apr 12, 2019 at 18:09 history asked JP McCarthy CC BY-SA 4.0