Timeline for Braided lobsters
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2020 at 9:17 | comment | added | Robert Frost | @NoahSchweber It sounds like you interpreted that the terminology motivated the question here but I see no reason to doubt that the question motivated the terminology. (I don't have access to the comments you refer to). | |
| Feb 17, 2020 at 18:19 | comment | added | Noah Schweber | Elaborating on Yemon Choi's comment, since the comments he refers to are now deleted: the OP suggested "lobster" as a term, it was observed that it was not in usage in that way, and the OP then asked this question and cited it as evidence to the contrary. | |
| Feb 17, 2020 at 17:39 | history | edited | YCor |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 13, 2019 at 16:55 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 14, 2019 at 10:39 | |||||
| Apr 10, 2019 at 22:17 | comment | added | Ilya Bogdanov | Just to clarify: I neither voted on the question. I just tried to guess downvoter's feeling which (if guessed correctly) I share only partly. | |
| Apr 10, 2019 at 7:57 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | @DerekHolt See mathoverflow.net/a/327619 and the comments for some context (I have not voted on that answer or on this question) | |
| Apr 10, 2019 at 7:22 | comment | added | Derek Holt | That's crazy. If someone asks a question about unramified multipotent groups, and you don't know what they are, you shoud just ignore the question and leave it for someone who does know to answer. By downvoting you just reveal your ignorance. | |
| Apr 10, 2019 at 6:03 | comment | added | Ilya Bogdanov | Perhaps, just because they saw an undefined unknown (to them) notion in the very first line of the text? | |
| Apr 10, 2019 at 3:05 | history | asked | Joseph Van Name | CC BY-SA 4.0 |