Timeline for Origin of the relations of Leavitt path algebras
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2019 at 14:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Apr 9, 2019 at 14:18 | comment | added | Nicola Ciccoli | I think the original motivation come from $C^*$-algebras and specifically from the fact that the Toeplitz algebra can be seen as the universal $C^*$-algebra generated by the unilateral shift on $l^2(\mathbb N)$. This shift can be interpreted as shifting along infinite paths by deleting one edge at each step. | |
| Apr 9, 2019 at 13:38 | answer | added | Benjamin Steinberg | timeline score: 3 | |
| S Apr 9, 2019 at 10:24 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body; edited title
|
| Apr 9, 2019 at 9:15 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 9, 2019 at 10:24 | |||||
| Apr 9, 2019 at 8:10 | comment | added | Tom De Medts | Did you read the "What is ... a Leavitt path algebra?" (by Gene Abrams) in the AMS notices? See ams.org/publications/journals/notices/201608/rnoti-p910.pdf. It explains to some extent why the defining relations are natural from the point of view of the Invariant Basis Number property of rings. | |
| Apr 9, 2019 at 7:50 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 9, 2019 at 8:22 | |||||
| Apr 9, 2019 at 7:48 | history | asked | Lastname | CC BY-SA 4.0 |