Timeline for When is a totally bounded set of an inductive limit contained in a component of this limit?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 7, 2019 at 18:38 | vote | accept | Sergei Akbarov | ||
Apr 7, 2019 at 18:09 | history | edited | Jochen Wengenroth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
Apr 7, 2019 at 17:47 | history | edited | Jochen Wengenroth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Details added
|
Apr 5, 2019 at 3:59 | comment | added | Sergei Akbarov | Jochen, excuse me, I could not reply before. I don't understand this place: "every neighbourhood of $0$ in $E$ contains the absolutely convex hull of $\bigcup_J U_J$ with $0$-neighbourhoods $U_J$ of in $E_J$ which only give conditions on values $f(j)$ for $j\in F(J)$ finite, then there is a finite subset $F$ of $I$ with $I\setminus F \subseteq \bigcup_J J\setminus F(J)$". As far as I understand, you mean that the topology of $E$ is induced from ${\mathbb R}^I$. I did not understand, why. | |
Apr 3, 2019 at 11:25 | history | edited | Jochen Wengenroth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 867 characters in body
|
Apr 3, 2019 at 10:08 | history | edited | Jochen Wengenroth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
Apr 3, 2019 at 8:07 | history | answered | Jochen Wengenroth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |