(2) is false; This argument does not require any additional hypothesis, and the center of massproof is always the centroid of a plane figurecute, so any figure without rotational symmetry is a counterexample. (A scalene triangle for example.)
As for (1)I thought I'd include it suffices by the above to show that there. I claim: There is a uniqueat most one point satisfying the condition you require, that is, that any line through it divides $A$ into areas of equal measure. (We assume that $A$ has positive measure.)
Assume the contrary, and let $a, b$ be two such points. Let $l_a$ be a line passing through $a$ and let $l_b$ be a line passing through $b$, with $l_a, l_b$ parallel, such that the region between $l_a$ and $l_b$ contains a subset $S$ of $A$ with non-zero measure. (Such a pair of lines exists as otherwise $A$ is concentrated on the line connecting $a, b$ and thus has zero measure.) But then in your notation we have $|A|=|A|/2+|A|/2+|S|$ which is impossible. So $a=b$.