Skip to main content
added link to the paper (the question has been bumped anyway)
Source Link

A paper dealing with this (and other) questions for the weak topology of a Banach space ... H. H. Corson, "The weak toplology of a Banach space""The weak topology of a Banach space" Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 101 (1961) 1--15.

In that case:

X$X$ is paracompact iff X$X$ is LindelofLindelöf.

If X^n$X^n$ is normal for all n$n$, then X$X$ is real-compact.

A paper dealing with this (and other) questions for the weak topology of a Banach space ... H. H. Corson, "The weak toplology of a Banach space" Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 101 (1961) 1--15.

In that case:

X is paracompact iff X is Lindelof.

If X^n is normal for all n, then X is real-compact.

A paper dealing with this (and other) questions for the weak topology of a Banach space ... H. H. Corson, "The weak topology of a Banach space" Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 101 (1961) 1--15.

In that case:

$X$ is paracompact iff $X$ is Lindelöf.

If $X^n$ is normal for all $n$, then $X$ is real-compact.

Source Link
Gerald Edgar
  • 41.1k
  • 5
  • 125
  • 219

A paper dealing with this (and other) questions for the weak topology of a Banach space ... H. H. Corson, "The weak toplology of a Banach space" Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 101 (1961) 1--15.

In that case:

X is paracompact iff X is Lindelof.

If X^n is normal for all n, then X is real-compact.