Skip to main content
copy edit
Source Link
Charles Matthews
  • 12.6k
  • 35
  • 64

Status of Hilbert-Smith conjecture and H-S conjecture for HolderHölder actions.

The Hilbert-Smith conjecture states that

If $G$ is a locally compact group which acts effectively on a connected manifold as a topological transformation group then is $G$ a Lie group.

It was established for actionactions by diffeomorphisms by Bochner and Montgomery. Later on it was also established for (compact?) actions by Lipschitz homeomorphisms (Repovs and Shchepin) and Holder actionHölder actions with very large exponent (>dim M/ dim M+2).

I am interested if the conjecture holds for HolderHölder actions (with small exponents). Is it plausible these arguments can be pushed to get the conjecture for HolderHölder actions? Or there is a fundamental obstruction?

Also, there is a 2001 preprint "A Proof of the Hilbert-Smith Conjecture" on arxiv that claims the full conjecture. I assume it's wrong as it wasn't published, but a comment from an expert would be highly appreciated.

Status of Hilbert-Smith conjecture and H-S conjecture for Holder actions.

Hilbert-Smith conjecture states that

If $G$ is a locally compact group which acts effectively on a connected manifold as a topological transformation group then is $G$ a Lie group.

It was established for action by diffeomorphisms by Bochner and Montgomery. Later on it was also established for (compact?) actions by Lipschitz homeomorphisms (Repovs and Shchepin) and Holder action with very large exponent (>dim M/ dim M+2).

I am interested if the conjecture holds for Holder actions (with small exponents). Is it plausible these arguments can be pushed to get the conjecture for Holder actions? Or there is a fundamental obstruction?

Also, there is a 2001 preprint "A Proof of the Hilbert-Smith Conjecture" on arxiv that claims the full conjecture. I assume it's wrong as it wasn't published, but a comment from an expert would be highly appreciated.

Status of Hilbert-Smith conjecture and H-S conjecture for Hölder actions

The Hilbert-Smith conjecture states that

If $G$ is a locally compact group which acts effectively on a connected manifold as a topological transformation group then is $G$ a Lie group.

It was established for actions by diffeomorphisms by Bochner and Montgomery. Later on it was also established for (compact?) actions by Lipschitz homeomorphisms (Repovs and Shchepin) and Hölder actions with very large exponent (>dim M/ dim M+2).

I am interested if the conjecture holds for Hölder actions (with small exponents). Is it plausible these arguments can be pushed to get the conjecture for Hölder actions? Or there is a fundamental obstruction?

Also, there is a 2001 preprint "A Proof of the Hilbert-Smith Conjecture" on arxiv that claims the full conjecture. I assume it's wrong as it wasn't published, but a comment from an expert would be highly appreciated.

retag and typo
Source Link
algori
  • 23.5k
  • 3
  • 100
  • 152

Hilbert-Smith conjecture states that

If $G$ is a locally compact group which acts effectively on a connected manifold as a topological transformation group then is $G$ a Lie group.

It was established for action by diffeomorphisms by Bochner and Montgomery. Later on it was also established for (compact?) actions by Lipschitz homeomorphisms (Repovs and Shchepin) and Holder action with very large exponent (>dim M/ dim M+2).

I am interested if the conjecture holds for Holder actions (with small exponents). Is it plausible these arguments can be pushed to get the conjecture for Holder actions? Or there is a fundamental obstruction?

Also, there is a 2001 preprint "A Proof of the Hilbert-Smith Conjecture" on arxiv that claims the full conjecture. I assume it's wrong as it wasn't published, but a comment from an expert would be highly appreciated.

Hilbert-Smith conjecture states that

If $G$ is a locally compact group which acts effectively on a connected manifold as a topological transformation group then is $G$ a Lie group.

It was established for action by diffeomorphisms by Bochner and Montgomery. Later on it was also established for (compact?) actions by Lipschitz homeomorphisms (Repovs and Shchepin) and Holder action with very large exponent (>dim M/ dim M+2).

I am interested if the conjecture holds for Holder actions (with small exponents). Is it plausible these arguments can be pushed to get the conjecture for Holder actions? Or there is a fundamental obstruction?

Also, there is a 2001 preprint "A Proof of the Hilbert-Smith Conjecture" on arxiv that claims the full conjecture. I assume it's wrong as it wasn't published, but a comment from an expert would highly appreciated.

Hilbert-Smith conjecture states that

If $G$ is a locally compact group which acts effectively on a connected manifold as a topological transformation group then is $G$ a Lie group.

It was established for action by diffeomorphisms by Bochner and Montgomery. Later on it was also established for (compact?) actions by Lipschitz homeomorphisms (Repovs and Shchepin) and Holder action with very large exponent (>dim M/ dim M+2).

I am interested if the conjecture holds for Holder actions (with small exponents). Is it plausible these arguments can be pushed to get the conjecture for Holder actions? Or there is a fundamental obstruction?

Also, there is a 2001 preprint "A Proof of the Hilbert-Smith Conjecture" on arxiv that claims the full conjecture. I assume it's wrong as it wasn't published, but a comment from an expert would be highly appreciated.

Source Link
Zarathustra
  • 1.4k
  • 12
  • 20

Status of Hilbert-Smith conjecture and H-S conjecture for Holder actions.

Hilbert-Smith conjecture states that

If $G$ is a locally compact group which acts effectively on a connected manifold as a topological transformation group then is $G$ a Lie group.

It was established for action by diffeomorphisms by Bochner and Montgomery. Later on it was also established for (compact?) actions by Lipschitz homeomorphisms (Repovs and Shchepin) and Holder action with very large exponent (>dim M/ dim M+2).

I am interested if the conjecture holds for Holder actions (with small exponents). Is it plausible these arguments can be pushed to get the conjecture for Holder actions? Or there is a fundamental obstruction?

Also, there is a 2001 preprint "A Proof of the Hilbert-Smith Conjecture" on arxiv that claims the full conjecture. I assume it's wrong as it wasn't published, but a comment from an expert would highly appreciated.