Skip to main content

Timeline for Partial sums of primes

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

33 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 2, 2019 at 5:09 comment added user44191 @YemonChoi While the editing was annoying, it does seem to have stopped (last edit 5 days ago).
Apr 2, 2019 at 4:14 comment added Yemon Choi I'm voting to close this question because the OP persists in these edits. (I agree with GP and GM)
Apr 2, 2019 at 3:05 review Close votes
Apr 2, 2019 at 16:02
Mar 30, 2019 at 20:09 comment added Enzo Creti @Gerhard Paseman 7 is the 4th prime, 8263 is the 1036th prime. 7/7(sum of digits of 7)=1 and 4# has 1 digit. 8263/19(sum of digits of 8263) is truncated equal to 434...1036# has 434 digits where # is primorial function
Mar 28, 2019 at 21:30 comment added Gerry Myerson Version 16. Please, homunc, give it a rest.
Mar 28, 2019 at 18:54 comment added Gerhard Paseman I find these frequent edits go against the purpose of this forum. If you want to record frequent observations on a daily basis (whether they are significant or not), start a blog. You have asked a main question and gotten a reasonable answer; now move on. The numerology associated with the problem does not belong here. Next week, if you find a third prime satisfying the relations, you can report that here. Gerhard "Know When To Fold 'Em" Paseman, 2019.03.28.
Mar 28, 2019 at 18:09 history edited Enzo Creti CC BY-SA 4.0
added 108 characters in body
Mar 28, 2019 at 15:24 comment added Enzo Creti $7$ is a Mersenne prime. $8263$ is the sum of five Mersenne primes $17$+$17$+$31$+$8191$+$31$+$7$.
Mar 28, 2019 at 14:52 history edited Enzo Creti CC BY-SA 4.0
added 218 characters in body
Mar 28, 2019 at 7:56 history edited Enzo Creti CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 262 characters in body
Mar 27, 2019 at 21:35 comment added Gerry Myerson Now up to Version 13.
Mar 27, 2019 at 11:54 history edited Enzo Creti CC BY-SA 4.0
added 51 characters in body
Mar 27, 2019 at 11:17 history edited Enzo Creti CC BY-SA 4.0
added 72 characters in body
Mar 27, 2019 at 10:50 history edited Enzo Creti CC BY-SA 4.0
added 141 characters in body
Mar 26, 2019 at 21:11 comment added Gerry Myerson Seven edits in the last 12 hours.
Mar 26, 2019 at 18:23 history edited Enzo Creti CC BY-SA 4.0
added 85 characters in body
Mar 26, 2019 at 16:27 history edited Enzo Creti CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 157 characters in body
Mar 26, 2019 at 16:20 history edited Enzo Creti CC BY-SA 4.0
added 153 characters in body
Mar 26, 2019 at 15:55 history edited Enzo Creti CC BY-SA 4.0
added 94 characters in body
Mar 26, 2019 at 15:23 history edited Enzo Creti CC BY-SA 4.0
added 274 characters in body
Mar 26, 2019 at 15:13 comment added Alex M. Possible duplicate of Why do primes dislike dividing the sum of all the preceding primes?
Mar 26, 2019 at 12:01 comment added Enzo Creti @Peter $8+2+6+3=19$. $8263+19-1=91^2$ where 91 is 19 reversed
Mar 26, 2019 at 9:22 comment added Peter The second solution ($8263$) has some amazing properties : The sum of its digits, the sum of the squares of its digits and the sum of the fifth powers of its digits are prime as well as $$8^8+2^2+6^6+3^3$$
Mar 26, 2019 at 8:52 history edited Enzo Creti CC BY-SA 4.0
added 72 characters in body
Mar 26, 2019 at 8:21 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 4.0
added 45 characters in body; edited tags
Mar 26, 2019 at 8:17 history edited Enzo Creti CC BY-SA 4.0
added 40 characters in body
Mar 26, 2019 at 7:40 comment added Enzo Creti @Alex M.@Mark Fischler the heuristic is the same for primes p(n) dividing the sum of primes up to p(n+1) and for primes p(n) dividing the sum of primes up to p(n). But it seems that in the first case primes are rarer. Why?
Mar 25, 2019 at 22:31 comment added Alex M. Strongly related: mathoverflow.net/questions/120511/…. Also crossposted on MSE: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3161810/23571113 (please don't do this anymore).
Mar 25, 2019 at 17:20 history became hot network question
Mar 25, 2019 at 16:45 review Close votes
Mar 26, 2019 at 20:33
Mar 25, 2019 at 16:42 answer added Mark Fischler timeline score: 17
Mar 25, 2019 at 16:12 history edited Enzo Creti CC BY-SA 4.0
added 6 characters in body
Mar 25, 2019 at 15:56 history asked Enzo Creti CC BY-SA 4.0