Timeline for A006517: Integers with $n\mid 2^n+2$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2019 at 18:40 | comment | added | Max Alekseyev | @kawa: The infiniteness property traces back at least to the Sierpinski book of 1970. | |
| Mar 24, 2019 at 18:37 | history | edited | W-t-P | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 51 characters in body
|
| Mar 24, 2019 at 18:31 | comment | added | W-t-P | @kawa: Thank you, I corrected the reference. | |
| Mar 24, 2019 at 18:31 | comment | added | W-t-P | @MaxAlekseyev: I added a couple of paragraphs which, to some extent, address your concern. | |
| Mar 24, 2019 at 18:27 | history | edited | W-t-P | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 743 characters in body
|
| Mar 24, 2019 at 14:52 | comment | added | hookah | Just to note: This problem is NOT from IMO 2009. The magazine you've published has IMO 2009 on that current version, and this is just their problem corner question. | |
| Mar 24, 2019 at 4:23 | comment | added | Max Alekseyev | I see little hope for answering this. A negative answer would imply existence of a new Wieferich prime, while it's unclear how one can approach a positive answer. | |
| Mar 23, 2019 at 7:56 | history | asked | W-t-P | CC BY-SA 4.0 |