Timeline for Monotonicity of Schrödinger Eigenvalues
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2019 at 14:48 | vote | accept | julian | ||
| S Mar 28, 2019 at 14:48 | history | bounty ended | julian | ||
| S Mar 28, 2019 at 14:48 | history | notice removed | julian | ||
| Mar 26, 2019 at 13:47 | answer | added | Carlo Beenakker | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 26, 2019 at 12:51 | history | edited | julian | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Mar 26, 2019 at 12:25 | comment | added | julian | Thank you very much for the reference. I updated the question. I don't understand the notation of the author. What does he mean by $P_{n,m}^{\alpha,\beta}$? | |
| Mar 26, 2019 at 12:22 | history | edited | julian | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 427 characters in body
|
| Mar 25, 2019 at 14:21 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | an exact solution for this potential, with Dirichlet instead of Neumann boundary conditions, is given at Schrödinger Equation with Double- Cosine and Sine – Squared Potential by Darboux Transformation Method and Supersymmetry. You should probably be able to use the same set method of solution for the Neumann boundary conditions. | |
| Mar 25, 2019 at 11:27 | history | edited | julian | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Mar 25, 2019 at 6:49 | history | edited | julian | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 547 characters in body
|
| Mar 24, 2019 at 16:43 | history | edited | julian |
edited tags
|
|
| S Mar 22, 2019 at 7:47 | history | bounty started | julian | ||
| S Mar 22, 2019 at 7:47 | history | notice added | julian | Draw attention | |
| Mar 20, 2019 at 7:27 | comment | added | julian | Isn't this the result which I'm referring to? | |
| Mar 20, 2019 at 5:35 | comment | added | ericf | Have you tried the standard first order perturbation calculation? en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perturbation_theory_(quantum_mechanics) | |
| Mar 19, 2019 at 21:01 | history | asked | julian | CC BY-SA 4.0 |