Timeline for Different definitions of the linking number
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 18, 2019 at 17:50 | vote | accept | Piotr Hajlasz | ||
Mar 18, 2019 at 17:34 | answer | added | j.c. | timeline score: 5 | |
Mar 18, 2019 at 16:57 | comment | added | Piotr Hajlasz | @j.c. Thank you for the reference. I was not aware of this paper. If you post it as an answer, I will accept it. | |
Mar 18, 2019 at 16:44 | comment | added | j.c. | Is Proposition 3.3 in DeTurck and Gluck's "Linking Integrals in the n-sphere" explicit enough? mat.unb.br/~matcont/34_10.pdf The main focus of the paper is on an integral formula for the linking number though. | |
Mar 18, 2019 at 13:07 | history | edited | Piotr Hajlasz | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 233 characters in body
|
Feb 27, 2019 at 22:10 | comment | added | Ryan Budney | I don't have the reference here, but I believe it's all spelled out in Bredon's Geometry and Topology textbook. I imagine someone will stop by with a precise reference soon. In the text he build the links between degrees intersection theory, Thom classes, Poincare duality, etc. | |
Feb 27, 2019 at 20:29 | history | edited | Piotr Hajlasz |
edited tags
|
|
Feb 27, 2019 at 20:26 | history | edited | YCor |
edited tags
|
|
Feb 27, 2019 at 19:58 | history | asked | Piotr Hajlasz | CC BY-SA 4.0 |