Timeline for On Primes in Arithmetic Progressions
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2019 at 13:25 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 26, 2019 at 15:47 | |||||
| Feb 23, 2019 at 18:57 | comment | added | Greg Martin | Also, every two numbers form an arithmetic progression of length $2$, so $k=2$ is a trivial case. | |
| Feb 23, 2019 at 17:03 | history | edited | user136205 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 137 characters in the body
|
| Feb 23, 2019 at 16:57 | comment | added | GH from MO | I suggest that the OP closes this question as obsolete. | |
| Feb 23, 2019 at 16:52 | history | edited | user136205 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 137 characters in body
|
| Feb 23, 2019 at 16:51 | comment | added | user136205 | @Lucia Ah, of course. I see where I made an error. | |
| Feb 23, 2019 at 16:35 | comment | added | Lucia | If you start with a prime $p$, then the common difference of a progression that begins with $p$ must be coprime to $p$. But then you cannot have more than a $p$ term progression before hitting a multiple of $p$. | |
| Feb 23, 2019 at 16:33 | history | edited | user136205 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 147 characters in body
|
| Feb 23, 2019 at 16:20 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 23, 2019 at 16:22 | |||||
| Feb 23, 2019 at 16:19 | history | asked | user136205 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |