Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 25, 2019 at 8:08 comment added user44143 @JairoBochi, I tried that, but the integrals are long enough that Mathematica stops without an answer, so I stopped too.
Feb 25, 2019 at 7:51 comment added Jairo Bochi So far I haven't been able to prove that the optimizer must contain a discrete (ie atomic) component. Maybe this is false, and what is going on is that the density tends to infinity at 0 and 1... I ask you the following: What if we combine two Beta distributions, one with parameters $>1$, another with parameters $<1$? Does this lead to an improvement?
Feb 23, 2019 at 14:57 history edited user44143 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 3 characters in body
Feb 23, 2019 at 7:21 comment added user44143 The symmetric Beta distribution is one of the simplest distributions on the unit interval. Perhaps it maximizes a function of the order statistics like $E[X_{(2)}-X_{(1)}]/\sigma$; I'd be surprised if it's not the solution to some optimization.
Feb 23, 2019 at 7:11 comment added Jairo Bochi Since it seems out of reach to find an exact solution for the baby problem (unless a miracle happens), I think that a more modest but still very nice problem would be to prove that any (the unique?) optimizing distribution is indeed a non-trivial mixture of discrete and continuous distributions.
Feb 23, 2019 at 7:09 comment added Jairo Bochi I see. But is there any reason to believe that the true optimizer will have a Beta component?
Feb 23, 2019 at 7:07 comment added user44143 @JairoBochi, I figure what it lacks in optimality, it makes up for with round parameters and being exactly calculable.
Feb 23, 2019 at 7:05 comment added Jairo Bochi Nice! This agrees much more with my experiments. As you say, your distribution seems almost optimal, but not exactly optimal. Indeed, the optimal distribution supported on a uniform mesh of 20 points yields an integral >.0615.
Feb 23, 2019 at 6:50 history answered user44143 CC BY-SA 4.0