Timeline for Minimum number of contractions needed to obtain a particular invariant set
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2010 at 14:02 | vote | accept | Mark Bell | ||
| Aug 4, 2010 at 15:13 | answer | added | Gerald Edgar | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 27, 2010 at 10:03 | answer | added | Lasse Rempe | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 18, 2010 at 18:40 | comment | added | Mark Bell | Ah - although it might not be obvious at first, $\psi_1$ and $\psi_2$ were chosen such that $\psi_1 \circ \psi_2 = \phi_1$, $\psi_1 \circ \psi_1 = \phi_2$, $\psi_2 \circ \psi_2 = \phi_3$ and $\psi_2 \circ \psi_1 = \phi_4$. But is dont think this process will generalise well. | |
| Jul 18, 2010 at 9:41 | comment | added | Victor Protsak | Can you, please, comment on what makes the $\psi$ IFS work? What is the relation between the semigroups generated by $\phi$ and $\psi$? | |
| Jul 18, 2010 at 0:53 | history | edited | Yemon Choi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
fixed some spelling and added a tag
|
| Jul 17, 2010 at 22:47 | history | asked | Mark Bell | CC BY-SA 2.5 |