Timeline for Subdivision of simplicial sets, but not the barycentric one
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2021 at 22:21 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
TeX, and links to papers, while this is on the front page
|
| Feb 11, 2019 at 11:27 | vote | accept | Tim Porter | ||
| Feb 11, 2019 at 11:27 | |||||
| Feb 11, 2019 at 6:35 | comment | added | Tim Porter | Thanks, Peter. For once I am not looking for something functorial! I also want, if possible, to avoid using geometric realisation. In the case of simplicial complexes (as used in Geometric Topology, for example) one may have that two such agree except near some subcomplex, where the simplexes in one are related to those in the other in the way you describe. I am looking for a characterisation of such contexts which would extend to the simplicial set case. I knew of Segal's paper and have used it. | |
| Feb 10, 2019 at 22:02 | history | answered | Peter May | CC BY-SA 4.0 |