Timeline for Resolution by locally free $G$-equivariant sheaves on varieties
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2019 at 13:03 | vote | accept | DKS | ||
| Feb 6, 2019 at 11:05 | comment | added | DKS | A reference for my comment is an exercise in Hartshorne, number III.6.9a if I remember correctly. | |
| Feb 6, 2019 at 11:05 | comment | added | DKS | I did end up finding a discussion in Chriss and Ginsburg, Representation Theory and Complex Geometry, the beginning of chapter 5. | |
| Feb 6, 2019 at 5:13 | comment | added | Phil Tosteson | @DKS Ah, I didn't know that fact. It does seem then that you could use averaging to construct an equivariant resolution. Do you have a reference? | |
| Feb 6, 2019 at 2:45 | history | edited | Phil Tosteson | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 48 characters in body
|
| Feb 6, 2019 at 2:18 | comment | added | DKS | Also, thank you for enlightening me with regards to the claimed fact. | |
| Feb 6, 2019 at 2:15 | comment | added | DKS | I see that finiteness is heavily used, but since a finite resolution of locally free sheaves exists on any regular variety, I’m not sure that projectivity hypotheses are needed. | |
| Feb 6, 2019 at 0:56 | history | edited | Phil Tosteson | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added description of Serres resolution
|
| Feb 5, 2019 at 22:57 | history | undeleted | Phil Tosteson | ||
| Feb 5, 2019 at 22:57 | history | edited | Phil Tosteson | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed error
|
| Feb 5, 2019 at 22:54 | history | deleted | Phil Tosteson | via Vote | |
| Feb 5, 2019 at 22:43 | history | answered | Phil Tosteson | CC BY-SA 4.0 |