Skip to main content
added 129 characters in body
Source Link
David Roberts
  • 35.4k
  • 11
  • 124
  • 349

Kiran Kedlaya finished the proof of Deligne's conjecture (1.2.10) made in La conjecture de Weil, II, which is definitely "noteworthy", and perhaps "not so famous" compared to the original Weil conjectures.

https://www.math.rutgers.edu/news-events/list-all-events/icalrepeat.detail/2019/02/06/10062/-/companions-in-etale-cohomology Colloquium talk: Companions in etale cohomology.

http://kskedlaya.org/galc.shtmlAnnotated reading list for the working seminar at the IAS on the proof.

Kiran Kedlaya finished the proof of Deligne's conjecture (1.2.10) made in La conjecture de Weil, II, which is definitely "noteworthy", and perhaps "not so famous" compared to the original Weil conjectures.

https://www.math.rutgers.edu/news-events/list-all-events/icalrepeat.detail/2019/02/06/10062/-/companions-in-etale-cohomology

http://kskedlaya.org/galc.shtml

Kiran Kedlaya finished the proof of Deligne's conjecture (1.2.10) made in La conjecture de Weil, II, which is definitely "noteworthy", and perhaps "not so famous" compared to the original Weil conjectures.

Colloquium talk: Companions in etale cohomology.

Annotated reading list for the working seminar at the IAS on the proof.

Source Link
user27976
  • 724
  • 4
  • 12

Kiran Kedlaya finished the proof of Deligne's conjecture (1.2.10) made in La conjecture de Weil, II, which is definitely "noteworthy", and perhaps "not so famous" compared to the original Weil conjectures.

https://www.math.rutgers.edu/news-events/list-all-events/icalrepeat.detail/2019/02/06/10062/-/companions-in-etale-cohomology

http://kskedlaya.org/galc.shtml

Post Made Community Wiki by user27976