Skip to main content
fixed typos
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286

Confusion on summand of hochschildHochschild homology of dD-modules

I've encountered the following confusion.

Start with the category of perfect dD-modules on $\mathbb{A} ^{1}$, which I'll denote $D$. We have the object $\mathcal{O}$, which is exceptional in the sense of having derived endomorphism ring $k$.

I believe that this implies that the subcategory generated by $\mathcal{O}$ is an admissible subcategory and so it'sits Hochschild homology is a summand of that of $D$. On the other hand the hochschildHochschild homology of the category $D$ aughtought to be the Hochschild homology of the algebra of differential operators on $\mathbb{A} ^{1}$, which has vanishing zero degree component, and thus the confusion.

Evidently I'm missing an assumption somewhere, but I've been unable to locate exactly where and help would be appreciated.

Edit: I should point out that Morita theory implies that the subcategory generated by $\mathcal{O}$ is isomorphic to perfect complexes over $\mathbb{R}End(\mathcal{O})=k$.

Confusion on summand of hochschild homology of d-modules

I've encountered the following confusion.

Start with the category of perfect d-modules on $\mathbb{A} ^{1}$, which I'll denote $D$. We have the object $\mathcal{O}$, which is exceptional in the sense of having derived endomorphism ring $k$.

I believe that this implies that the subcategory generated by $\mathcal{O}$ is an admissible subcategory and so it's Hochschild homology is a summand of that of $D$. On the other hand the hochschild homology of the category $D$ aught to be the Hochschild homology of the algebra of differential operators on $\mathbb{A} ^{1}$, which has vanishing zero degree component, and thus the confusion.

Evidently I'm missing an assumption somewhere, but I've been unable to locate exactly where and help would be appreciated.

Edit: I should point out that Morita theory implies that the subcategory generated by $\mathcal{O}$ is isomorphic to perfect complexes over $\mathbb{R}End(\mathcal{O})=k$.

Confusion on summand of Hochschild homology of D-modules

I've encountered the following confusion.

Start with the category of perfect D-modules on $\mathbb{A} ^{1}$, which I'll denote $D$. We have the object $\mathcal{O}$, which is exceptional in the sense of having derived endomorphism ring $k$.

I believe that this implies that the subcategory generated by $\mathcal{O}$ is an admissible subcategory and so its Hochschild homology is a summand of that of $D$. On the other hand the Hochschild homology of the category $D$ ought to be the Hochschild homology of the algebra of differential operators on $\mathbb{A} ^{1}$, which has vanishing zero degree component, and thus the confusion.

Evidently I'm missing an assumption somewhere, but I've been unable to locate exactly where and help would be appreciated.

Edit: I should point out that Morita theory implies that the subcategory generated by $\mathcal{O}$ is isomorphic to perfect complexes over $\mathbb{R}End(\mathcal{O})=k$.

added 175 characters in body
Source Link
user108998
user108998

I've encountered the following confusion.

Start with the category of perfect d-modules on $\mathbb{A} ^{1}$, which I'll denote $D$. We have the object $\mathcal{O}$, which is exceptional in the sense of having derived endomorphism ring $k$.

I believe that this implies that the subcategory generated by $\mathcal{O}$ is an admissible subcategory and so it's Hochschild homology is a summand of that of $D$. On the other hand the hochschild homology of the category $D$ aught to be the Hochschild homology of the algebra of differential operators on $\mathbb{A} ^{1}$, which has vanishing zero degree component, and thus the confusion.

Evidently I'm missing an assumption somewhere, but I've been unable to locate exactly where and help would be appreciated.

Edit: I should point out that Morita theory implies that the subcategory generated by $\mathcal{O}$ is isomorphic to perfect complexes over $\mathbb{R}End(\mathcal{O})=k$.

I've encountered the following confusion.

Start with the category of perfect d-modules on $\mathbb{A} ^{1}$, which I'll denote $D$. We have the object $\mathcal{O}$, which is exceptional in the sense of having derived endomorphism ring $k$.

I believe that this implies that the subcategory generated by $\mathcal{O}$ is an admissible subcategory and so it's Hochschild homology is a summand of that of $D$. On the other hand the hochschild homology of the category $D$ aught to be the Hochschild homology of the algebra of differential operators on $\mathbb{A} ^{1}$, which has vanishing zero degree component, and thus the confusion.

Evidently I'm missing an assumption somewhere, but I've been unable to locate exactly where and help would be appreciated.

I've encountered the following confusion.

Start with the category of perfect d-modules on $\mathbb{A} ^{1}$, which I'll denote $D$. We have the object $\mathcal{O}$, which is exceptional in the sense of having derived endomorphism ring $k$.

I believe that this implies that the subcategory generated by $\mathcal{O}$ is an admissible subcategory and so it's Hochschild homology is a summand of that of $D$. On the other hand the hochschild homology of the category $D$ aught to be the Hochschild homology of the algebra of differential operators on $\mathbb{A} ^{1}$, which has vanishing zero degree component, and thus the confusion.

Evidently I'm missing an assumption somewhere, but I've been unable to locate exactly where and help would be appreciated.

Edit: I should point out that Morita theory implies that the subcategory generated by $\mathcal{O}$ is isomorphic to perfect complexes over $\mathbb{R}End(\mathcal{O})=k$.

Source Link
user108998
user108998

Confusion on summand of hochschild homology of d-modules

I've encountered the following confusion.

Start with the category of perfect d-modules on $\mathbb{A} ^{1}$, which I'll denote $D$. We have the object $\mathcal{O}$, which is exceptional in the sense of having derived endomorphism ring $k$.

I believe that this implies that the subcategory generated by $\mathcal{O}$ is an admissible subcategory and so it's Hochschild homology is a summand of that of $D$. On the other hand the hochschild homology of the category $D$ aught to be the Hochschild homology of the algebra of differential operators on $\mathbb{A} ^{1}$, which has vanishing zero degree component, and thus the confusion.

Evidently I'm missing an assumption somewhere, but I've been unable to locate exactly where and help would be appreciated.