Timeline for A question concerning the developing map of (G,X) manifolds
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2019 at 9:51 | comment | added | user135350 | @YCor What I meant was for $\widetilde{U}$ diffeomorphic to both $U:=\mathfrak{p}(\widetilde{U})$ and $dev(\widetilde{U})$ , and $\varphi_U$ local coordinates on this open. | |
| Feb 3, 2019 at 9:47 | vote | accept | user135350 | ||
| Feb 3, 2019 at 1:46 | answer | added | Tsemo Aristide | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 3, 2019 at 1:27 | comment | added | YCor | It's hard to make sense of the question (the last sentence). What's "small enough $\tilde{U}$"? what's "for some $\varphi_U$" when $\varphi_U$ is already introduced? | |
| Feb 3, 2019 at 1:25 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 3, 2019 at 1:30 | |||||
| Feb 3, 2019 at 1:23 | history | asked | user135350 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |