Timeline for Use covering number to get uniform concentration from pointwise concentration
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2019 at 6:56 | history | edited | dohmatob | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Lipschitz constant: M ==> L
|
| Feb 1, 2019 at 6:54 | answer | added | dohmatob | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 1, 2019 at 6:03 | vote | accept | dohmatob | ||
| Jan 31, 2019 at 18:05 | answer | added | Aryeh Kontorovich | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 31, 2019 at 15:29 | history | edited | dohmatob | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 59 characters in body
|
| Jan 31, 2019 at 15:27 | comment | added | dohmatob | OK, I see. I just added the condition to the question. Thanks. This is so as to be able to bound the covering number of $\{X_\theta | \theta \in \Theta\}$ in terms of that of $\Theta$, right ? | |
| Jan 31, 2019 at 15:17 | comment | added | Aryeh Kontorovich | You need some Lipschitz (or other smoothness property) on $X_\theta$ in $\theta$. | |
| Jan 31, 2019 at 14:55 | history | asked | dohmatob | CC BY-SA 4.0 |