Skip to main content
Corrected spelling of Hirzebruch
Source Link
Neil Strickland
  • 56.9k
  • 7
  • 142
  • 262

Splittings in the difference bundle construction of Atiyah-HilzebruchHirzebruch

I'm reading the construction of difference bundle(generalized) in the paper of Atiyah-HilzebruchHirzebruch(Analytic cycles on complex manifolds)

There is one thing I cannot understand. The followings are in the page 34 in the paper.

For exact sequence of vector bundles on $Y$.

$0 \to E_n \stackrel{a_n}{\to} E_{n-1} \to \dots \to E_1 \stackrel{a_1}{\to} E_0 \stackrel{a_0}{\to} 0$

Let $F_i := Ker(a_i)$. Then $F_i$ are vector bundles and the following short exact sequences

$0 \to F_i \to E_i \to F_{i-1} \to 0$ splits.

I cannot find the reason why they splits and there is no condition on the space $Y$. Is there a reason the above sequence splits, or the term 'split' used in a different sense?

Splittings in the difference bundle construction of Atiyah-Hilzebruch

I'm reading the construction of difference bundle(generalized) in the paper of Atiyah-Hilzebruch(Analytic cycles on complex manifolds)

There is one thing I cannot understand. The followings are in the page 34 in the paper.

For exact sequence of vector bundles on $Y$.

$0 \to E_n \stackrel{a_n}{\to} E_{n-1} \to \dots \to E_1 \stackrel{a_1}{\to} E_0 \stackrel{a_0}{\to} 0$

Let $F_i := Ker(a_i)$. Then $F_i$ are vector bundles and the following short exact sequences

$0 \to F_i \to E_i \to F_{i-1} \to 0$ splits.

I cannot find the reason why they splits and there is no condition on the space $Y$. Is there a reason the above sequence splits, or the term 'split' used in a different sense?

Splittings in the difference bundle construction of Atiyah-Hirzebruch

I'm reading the construction of difference bundle(generalized) in the paper of Atiyah-Hirzebruch(Analytic cycles on complex manifolds)

There is one thing I cannot understand. The followings are in the page 34 in the paper.

For exact sequence of vector bundles on $Y$.

$0 \to E_n \stackrel{a_n}{\to} E_{n-1} \to \dots \to E_1 \stackrel{a_1}{\to} E_0 \stackrel{a_0}{\to} 0$

Let $F_i := Ker(a_i)$. Then $F_i$ are vector bundles and the following short exact sequences

$0 \to F_i \to E_i \to F_{i-1} \to 0$ splits.

I cannot find the reason why they splits and there is no condition on the space $Y$. Is there a reason the above sequence splits, or the term 'split' used in a different sense?

deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
keaton
  • 421
  • 2
  • 4

I'm reading the construction of difference bundle(generalized) in the paper of Atiyah-Hilzebruch(Analytic cycles on complex manifolds)

There is one thing I cannot understand. The followings are in the page 34 in the paper.

For exact sequence of vector bundles on $Y$.

$0 \to E_n \stackrel{a_n}{\to} E_{n-1} \to \dots \to E_1 \stackrel{a_1}{\to} E_0 \stackrel{a_0}{\to} 0$

Let $F_i := Ker(a_i)$. Then $F_i$ are vector bundles and the following short exact sequences

$0 \to F_i \to E_i \to F_{i-1} \to 0$ splits.

I cannot find the reason why they splits and there is no condition on the space $Y$. Is there a reason the above sequence splits, or the term 'split' used in a differenct sencedifferent sense?

I'm reading the construction of difference bundle(generalized) in the paper of Atiyah-Hilzebruch(Analytic cycles on complex manifolds)

There is one thing I cannot understand. The followings are in the page 34 in the paper.

For exact sequence of vector bundles on $Y$.

$0 \to E_n \stackrel{a_n}{\to} E_{n-1} \to \dots \to E_1 \stackrel{a_1}{\to} E_0 \stackrel{a_0}{\to} 0$

Let $F_i := Ker(a_i)$. Then $F_i$ are vector bundles and the following short exact sequences

$0 \to F_i \to E_i \to F_{i-1} \to 0$ splits.

I cannot find the reason why they splits and there is no condition on the space $Y$. Is there a reason the above sequence splits, or the term 'split' used in a differenct sence?

I'm reading the construction of difference bundle(generalized) in the paper of Atiyah-Hilzebruch(Analytic cycles on complex manifolds)

There is one thing I cannot understand. The followings are in the page 34 in the paper.

For exact sequence of vector bundles on $Y$.

$0 \to E_n \stackrel{a_n}{\to} E_{n-1} \to \dots \to E_1 \stackrel{a_1}{\to} E_0 \stackrel{a_0}{\to} 0$

Let $F_i := Ker(a_i)$. Then $F_i$ are vector bundles and the following short exact sequences

$0 \to F_i \to E_i \to F_{i-1} \to 0$ splits.

I cannot find the reason why they splits and there is no condition on the space $Y$. Is there a reason the above sequence splits, or the term 'split' used in a different sense?

Source Link
keaton
  • 421
  • 2
  • 4

Splittings in the difference bundle construction of Atiyah-Hilzebruch

I'm reading the construction of difference bundle(generalized) in the paper of Atiyah-Hilzebruch(Analytic cycles on complex manifolds)

There is one thing I cannot understand. The followings are in the page 34 in the paper.

For exact sequence of vector bundles on $Y$.

$0 \to E_n \stackrel{a_n}{\to} E_{n-1} \to \dots \to E_1 \stackrel{a_1}{\to} E_0 \stackrel{a_0}{\to} 0$

Let $F_i := Ker(a_i)$. Then $F_i$ are vector bundles and the following short exact sequences

$0 \to F_i \to E_i \to F_{i-1} \to 0$ splits.

I cannot find the reason why they splits and there is no condition on the space $Y$. Is there a reason the above sequence splits, or the term 'split' used in a differenct sence?