Skip to main content
26 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 26, 2019 at 19:02 answer added Sotiris timeline score: 1
Jan 26, 2019 at 18:47 history edited user3108815 CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Jan 26, 2019 at 17:32 history edited user3108815 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 5 characters in body
Jan 26, 2019 at 17:21 comment added user3108815 @Linas I looked at the book "A=B" for inspiration there.
Jan 26, 2019 at 17:20 history edited user3108815 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 182 characters in body; edited title
Jan 26, 2019 at 17:06 history edited user3108815 CC BY-SA 4.0
Edited to reflect LInas' point about extracting a partial sum formula
Jan 26, 2019 at 7:38 answer added Linas timeline score: 1
Jan 26, 2019 at 7:15 comment added Linas re: basic hypergeometric: what the wikipedia article does not say is that there are an infinite number of crazy identities connecting them all, and modern research on them is focused on finding algos that are able to list & classify the identities. I think Adamchick does this if I recall. But with a finite sum, I'm not clear on what you can do, or what you hope to get.
Jan 26, 2019 at 7:08 comment added Linas I don't know what you mean by a "partial sum". If this was an infinite series, you could almost surely re-write it in terms zetas (hurwitz or lerch), gammas and digammas, thetas or mock theta, binomial coefficients and stirling numbers and ascending or descending pochammers. Apply a dirichlet convolution to remove the denominator. There;'s almost an infinite number of these, limited by your creativity. But none of these kinds of rewrites make it simpler or "closed"; they just create lots of fun-looking identities.
Jan 25, 2019 at 21:55 history edited user3108815 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 8 characters in body
Jan 25, 2019 at 17:00 history edited user3108815 CC BY-SA 4.0
Added some links for background
Jan 25, 2019 at 7:02 comment added user3108815 @DavidRoberts Fixed the uncomfortable portions!
Jan 25, 2019 at 7:02 history edited user3108815 CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 8 characters in body
Jan 25, 2019 at 6:56 comment added David Roberts @user3108815 it was meant to be a joke: is $\mathbb Q <1$ ? :-) Why not $q\in (0,1)$? Is there something special about rational $q$? Why not just say in the text after the displayed equation that "where $q$ is an integer greater than 1 or a rational number in $(0,1)$"?
Jan 25, 2019 at 6:38 comment added user3108815 @DavidRoberts The intention was not to trigger you, I apologize. Can you (please) suggest the proper notation to express what is already intended to be expressed?
Jan 25, 2019 at 5:08 comment added David Roberts $0 \lt q \in \mathbb Q \lt 1$ [triggered]
Jan 25, 2019 at 4:57 history edited user3108815 CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Jan 25, 2019 at 4:55 comment added user3108815 @Linas I'd like a partial sum formula for the above, ideally.
Jan 24, 2019 at 18:22 comment added Linas What do you mean by "closed form"? Usually, a finite sum is considered to be a very satisfactory state of affairs; I can't quite imagine getting more "closed" than that. Anyway, have you looked at Lambert series?
Jan 24, 2019 at 17:09 comment added user3108815 Would the person who downvoted me care to let me know why I've received a downvote? I would love to edit the question if I'm in violation of the (extensive) rules.
Jan 24, 2019 at 7:40 review Close votes
Jan 27, 2019 at 18:21
Jan 24, 2019 at 5:31 history edited user3108815 CC BY-SA 4.0
edited for readability of the domain
Jan 24, 2019 at 5:23 comment added user3108815 edited for domain clarifications, $q$ can indeed be a rational between $0$ and $1$, or an integer $>\ 1$.
Jan 24, 2019 at 5:21 history edited user3108815 CC BY-SA 4.0
Domain specifications
Jan 24, 2019 at 3:25 review First posts
Jan 24, 2019 at 3:29
Jan 24, 2019 at 3:24 history asked user3108815 CC BY-SA 4.0