Timeline for Questions about a certain set of primes
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2019 at 11:29 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | This sequence may be oeis.org/A126263 | |
| Jan 22, 2019 at 4:59 | answer | added | kodlu | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 22, 2019 at 4:10 | comment | added | Michael Hardy | Maybe this is a bit of a tangent, but is any purpose served by writing $\left( \prod_{p_i \, \in \, A_{n-1}} p_i \right) + 1$ instead of $\left( \prod_{p \, \in \, A_{n-1}} p \right) + 1 \text{ ?} \qquad$ | |
| Jan 22, 2019 at 4:06 | history | edited | Michael Hardy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Jan 22, 2019 at 3:23 | comment | added | Joe Silverman | Why do you say that $A$ "clearly" does not contain all primes? I'm pretty sure that that is a long-standing open problem. Similarly if you adjoin to $A_{n-1}$ only the smallest prime dividing $x_n$, which is maybe more in the spirit of Euclid's original proof that there are infinitely many primes. | |
| Jan 22, 2019 at 2:24 | history | edited | Vik78 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 92 characters in body
|
| S Jan 22, 2019 at 2:22 | history | suggested | Amir Sagiv | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Latex and a little english
|
| Jan 22, 2019 at 2:15 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 22, 2019 at 2:22 | |||||
| Jan 22, 2019 at 1:45 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 22, 2019 at 2:15 | |||||
| Jan 22, 2019 at 1:44 | history | asked | Vik78 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |