Timeline for A new formula for the class number of the quadratic field $\mathbb Q(\sqrt{(-1)^{(p-1)/2}p})$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2019 at 2:31 | comment | added | MyNinthAccount | Reference(s) to Kummer concerning $h_p^-=2p\prod_\chi (-B_{1,\chi}/2)$ (product over odd characters mod $p$) are doi.org/10.1515/crll.1850.40.93 and sites.mathdoc.fr/JMPA/PDF/JMPA_1851_1_16_A24_0.pdf See page 42 of Washington (intro to Cyclotomic Fields) for the formula itself. | |
| Jan 18, 2019 at 8:26 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | @user134696 you of course do not, but maybe somebody else do? After all, this site is exactly for concerning other's failures. | |
| Jan 18, 2019 at 5:18 | comment | added | GH from MO | What you say is interesting (more interesting than most of the OP's questions). Can you please provide more detail? | |
| Jan 18, 2019 at 0:35 | comment | added | user134696 | @FedorPetrov I don't consider your failures to be any concern of mine. | |
| Jan 18, 2019 at 0:32 | comment | added | user134696 | @DustinClausen Your second comment is certainly true. As to the first, the phrasing should be viewed in the context of the quality and frequency of the OPs recent questions, together with the self-promotional reference to the OP's own paper, and finally due to being written by a curmudgeon. | |
| Jan 17, 2019 at 19:46 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | I fail to see any connection of the answer and the question. | |
| Jan 17, 2019 at 19:24 | comment | added | Dustin Clausen | Why so snarky? Formulas like this lose none of their magic just by being incorrectly phrased and over a century old. | |
| Jan 17, 2019 at 18:35 | comment | added | Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine | Could you add a reference for this (especially for the connection to Kumner)? | |
| Jan 17, 2019 at 18:25 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 17, 2019 at 19:42 | |||||
| Jan 17, 2019 at 18:24 | history | answered | user134696 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |