Timeline for perturbing one map to be transverse to a second map
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2019 at 8:14 | vote | accept | Klaus Niederkrüger | ||
| Jan 13, 2019 at 13:47 | answer | added | Mark Grant | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jan 13, 2019 at 13:24 | comment | added | Praphulla Koushik | May be you should add your comment in the question... This is interesting question.... What does it mean to say a set is residual in $C^{\infty}(M,N)$?? | |
| Jan 13, 2019 at 12:29 | comment | added | Klaus Niederkrüger | Don't know if the general situation can be solved, but in some particular cases, one could perturb f(M) to be a submanifold of N and suppose its normal bundle is trivial, then composing g with the projection to the fiber and using Sard's theorem, we would get that most sections in this normal bundle are transverse to g. | |
| Jan 13, 2019 at 12:10 | history | edited | Michael Albanese | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jan 13, 2019 at 11:27 | history | asked | Klaus Niederkrüger | CC BY-SA 4.0 |