Timeline for Shannon entropy of $p(x)(1-p(x))$ is no less than entropy of $p(x)$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 16, 2019 at 22:42 | vote | accept | sunxd | ||
Jan 12, 2019 at 12:10 | answer | added | Fedor Petrov | timeline score: 8 | |
Jan 12, 2019 at 9:43 | history | edited | Mark Wildon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Made $p$ discrete.
|
Jan 12, 2019 at 9:40 | comment | added | Mark Wildon | Ah: I see. I somehow misread 'finite support' as 'compact support'. I'm going to edit the question to make it clear that the density is discrete. | |
Jan 12, 2019 at 9:35 | comment | added | Fedor Petrov | I guess that density is a misleading word here: $p(x) $ is a measure of atom $\{x\} $. | |
Jan 12, 2019 at 8:58 | comment | added | Mark Wildon | There is something wrong in the setup: a probability density function may take values more than $1$. And without some continuity assumption on $p$ we could have $p(x) \in \{0,1\}$ for all $x$, so $p(x)(1-p(x)) = 0$ always. | |
Jan 12, 2019 at 8:57 | history | edited | Mark Wildon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Put in LaTeX, corrected spelling mistake, removed thank.
|
Jan 12, 2019 at 8:40 | history | edited | YCor |
edited tags
|
|
Jan 12, 2019 at 8:40 | review | First posts | |||
Jan 12, 2019 at 9:16 | |||||
Jan 12, 2019 at 8:37 | history | asked | sunxd | CC BY-SA 4.0 |