Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 19, 2022 at 13:01 comment added Roland Bacher @AndyPutman Andy, Thanks for this precision.
Oct 19, 2022 at 12:54 comment added Andy Putman @RolandBacher: The Tits alternative does not say that all subgroups of fg linear groups are either virtually solvable or free.
Oct 19, 2022 at 12:48 comment added Roland Bacher Is the negative answer not a consequence of the Tits alternative: Otherwise ${\mathrm{SL}}_3(\mathbb Z)$ (which is linear and finitely generated) contains $F_2\times \mathbb Z$ which is neither virtually solvable nor free?
Oct 19, 2022 at 11:45 answer added Giles Gardam timeline score: 4
Jan 8, 2019 at 18:13 vote accept burtonpeterj
Jan 8, 2019 at 18:13 vote accept burtonpeterj
Jan 8, 2019 at 18:13
Jan 8, 2019 at 14:33 answer added YCor timeline score: 13
Jan 8, 2019 at 9:26 comment added YCor No; more generally, let $G$ be a non-virtually-solvable subgroup of $\mathrm{GL}_3(\mathbf{C})$. Then the centralizer of $G$ is abelian. Indeed its Zariski closure contains a Zariski-closed copy of $\mathrm{(P)SL}_2(\mathbf{C})$. There are two such subgroups up to conjugation: the irreducible $\mathrm{PSL}_2(\mathbf{C})(=\mathrm{SO}_3)$ and the upper-left block. The first has a trivial centralizer, and the second has centralizer equal to the diagonal matrices $(a,a,b)$. [I'm pretty sure this argument already exists somewhere on this site.]
Jan 8, 2019 at 5:03 answer added Ian Agol timeline score: 11
Jan 8, 2019 at 0:58 history asked burtonpeterj CC BY-SA 4.0