Timeline for "Matchmaking website" for project-specific mathematical collaborations [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2019 at 3:05 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Jan 18, 2019 at 9:46 | |||||
| Jan 9, 2019 at 16:15 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Jan 9, 2019 at 16:52 | |||||
| Jan 9, 2019 at 3:09 | history | closed |
Andy Putman Neil Hoffman YCor user1073 Alexey Ustinov |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Jan 8, 2019 at 20:45 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 9, 2019 at 3:09 | |||||
| Jan 8, 2019 at 0:49 | comment | added | user60665 | @Michael I agree. Organizing a StackExchange type network to foster project specific collaborations instead of Q&A would seem a useful proposal. | |
| Jan 7, 2019 at 20:09 | comment | added | Michael | IMO such a website should not be limited to collaboration in only mathematics; rather it should be a matchmaking in any math, sci, or engineering projects, with math collab being one of the collab sister sites, much like MO is one of several Stack Exchange sister sites. That way collab can extend to other areas as well. | |
| Jan 7, 2019 at 19:28 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | "Hmm, Smith has expertise in Lie groups, viscosity methods, and KPZ universality, which are just what this project needs. But he puts $2\pi$ in the exponent when writing a Fourier transform? Swipe left." | |
| Jan 6, 2019 at 23:16 | comment | added | user60665 | @GerhardPaseman A specifically dedicated space for systematic usage is precisely what is lacking (as opposed to various tiny scattered places). | |
| Jan 6, 2019 at 22:22 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | There are polymath projects where a wiki is used to collect and organize work. There is MathOverflow where various specific topics are presented and those who wish to pursue further can use MathOverflow or email or some other means. (I did this last year with Jose Brox.) There are blogs where commentary and ideas are solicited with links to Github and other repositories of proofs, programs, and data. What would be lacking from a combination of these methods for doing a collaboration? Use a web search to find projects. Gerhard "Let's Get Together On This" Paseman, 2019.01.06. | |
| Jan 6, 2019 at 18:10 | history | edited | user60665 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Jan 6, 2019 at 17:22 | history | asked | user60665 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |