Timeline for Is the formal power series ring integrally closed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2019 at 13:24 | comment | added | Will Sawin | @JasonStarr Fair enough! | |
| Jan 6, 2019 at 13:24 | comment | added | P. Grape | Thank you for the answer. I am sorry that the title was misleading. | |
| Jan 6, 2019 at 13:16 | comment | added | Jason Starr | @WillSawin. I read the question in the title of the post. I see that the OP asks a different question in his post than is in the title of his post. | |
| Jan 6, 2019 at 13:08 | answer | added | Will Sawin | timeline score: 17 | |
| Jan 6, 2019 at 13:04 | comment | added | Will Sawin | @JasonStarr But normal means integrally closed in its field of fractions, which isn't being asked. | |
| Jan 6, 2019 at 12:55 | comment | added | Jason Starr | Welcome new contributor. Every power series ring over a regular Noetherian ring is a regular Noetherian ring. Every regular Noetherian ring is normal. | |
| Jan 6, 2019 at 12:50 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 6, 2019 at 19:58 | |||||
| Jan 6, 2019 at 12:30 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 6, 2019 at 12:35 | |||||
| Jan 6, 2019 at 12:29 | history | asked | P. Grape | CC BY-SA 4.0 |