Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 9, 2019 at 7:47 history edited user21230 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 818 characters in body
Apr 9, 2019 at 7:42 history edited user21230 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 818 characters in body
Jan 3, 2019 at 9:38 comment added user21230 I am afraid of editing my answer - it seems editing is persecuted on this forum - so I add new information as a comment. The number of norm 1 and trace -1 octonions is $q^6-q^3, q^6+q^3, q^6-1$ and stabilizer is $3.L_3(q), 3.U_3(q)$ or other for $q=1,2,0(mod 3)$. It would be interesting to connect maximal subgroups of $G_2(q)$ to subgroups fixing some subalgebras of octonions. What objects are fixed by sporadics $J_2$ and $J_1$ embedded in $G_2(4)$ and $G_2(11)$ ?
Jan 2, 2019 at 21:35 history edited user21230 CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Jan 2, 2019 at 15:02 comment added user21230 Over finite field there is just one version of octonions as far as I remember. In odd characteristic you can use both definitions but you receive the same algebra anyway. In characteristic two there is just one definition you should use - the one for split octonions - which you can extend to characteristic 2. I am not sure what similar algebras of dimension 8 exist over each of the finite field. I have not done any systematic research here. What I know for sure is that split octonions definition can be used over any field. See function OctaveAlgebra in GAP which defines such algebra.
Jan 2, 2019 at 14:23 comment added მამუკა ჯიბლაძე So there is no analog of the fact that over $\mathbb R$ there are split and non-split octonions which only become isomorphic over $\mathbb C$?
Jan 2, 2019 at 13:34 history edited user21230 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 40 characters in body
Jan 2, 2019 at 13:15 history edited user21230 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 258 characters in body
Jan 2, 2019 at 13:01 history edited user21230 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 55 characters in body
Jan 2, 2019 at 12:59 comment added user21230 Yes, in field GF(5) we have $2*2=-1$ and it works as well.
Jan 2, 2019 at 12:50 comment added მამუკა ჯიბლაძე Does this work regardless of whether the field contains square roots of $-1$ or not?
S Jan 2, 2019 at 12:15 history answered user21230 CC BY-SA 4.0
S Jan 2, 2019 at 12:15 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by user21230