Timeline for Finite dimensional Feynman integrals
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Jul 15, 2010 at 18:19 | comment | added | Abdelmalek Abdesselam | Great question! It would be nice to have a necessary and sufficient criterion, and also a precise connection between the different definitions (as in J.S. answer or via analytic continuation). Did you check Arnolʹd, V. I., Guseĭn-Zade, S. M., Varchenko, A. N., "Singularities of differentiable maps. Vol. II. Monodromy and asymptotics of integrals". Monographs in Mathematics, 83. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1988. viii+492 pp. ISBN: 0-8176-3185-2. It's the canonical reference for stationary phase with higher degree polynomials S. | |
| Jul 15, 2010 at 18:05 | history | edited | algori | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Jul 15, 2010 at 17:59 | history | edited | algori | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added a clerification
|
| Jul 15, 2010 at 17:19 | answer | added | Jeff Schenker | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jul 15, 2010 at 16:50 | answer | added | Anirbit | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 15, 2010 at 16:10 | answer | added | user1504 | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 15, 2010 at 15:53 | comment | added | algori | Steve -- thanks, but the pages you mention don't seem to address the convegence issues for general (non-quadratic) polynomials. | |
| Jul 15, 2010 at 12:39 | comment | added | Steve Huntsman | See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stationary_phase_approximation and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… | |
| Jul 15, 2010 at 6:01 | history | asked | algori | CC BY-SA 2.5 |